Posts Tagged ‘Obama’

The Fight Goes On

November 5th, 2012

Dear California OneCare Supporters,

Regardless of the outcome of the election tomorrow, there is still an overwhelming need to reform our sick healthcare system. No matter who is elected, we will still have a heartbreaking number of people who suffer and die because of profiteering in healthcare.

Mitt Romney has said that he will act to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA—Obamacare). Without the cooperation of Congress, of course, he will not be able to do so. And if he does somehow manage to repeal ACA, that will mean that 7 million Californians will remain without health insurance and we’ll be back where we were in 2010.

Barack Obama has said that millions of people will gain healthcare coverage in 2014 because of ACA. What he has not said is that even after it is fully implemented, there will still be 3 million Californians who won’t be covered. That’s equivalent to the entire populations of San Diego, San José, and San Francisco combined!

But the one provision of the Affordable Care Act that gives us hope says that any state can create its own health care system in 2017 as long as it provides an equivalent amount of access and coverage as the ACA. What we all know is that single payer can do much more than that. It will provide universal access and comprehensive coverage, and do it at half the cost. Full care, for all, for less!

Regardless of who is elected, we have our work cut out for us.

Our goal is simple: Single Payer in California in 2017. We are constructing a comprehensive campaign that involves grassroots, netroots, the entertainment industry, lobbying, and campaigning like you haven’t seen before in the fight for single payer.

So be sure you vote in this election. The outcome will affect many aspects of our lives. But the one thing that won’t change is our relentless pursuit of single payer healthcare. Thanks, of course, for your past support and vital donations. You can be assured, you’ll hear more about our plans soon, so stay with us. With your help, there is no doubt—We Will Win!

Don Schroeder, Chair

On Behalf of Andrew McGuire, Exective Director
and the California OneCare Board of Directors

Are federally sponsored health plans the camel’s nose under the tent?

October 31st, 2012

The Obama administration has just announced that it will offer federally-sponsored health benefits to the public as part of the health exchanges due to open up in 2014:

These multistate plans were included in President Obama’s health care law as a substitute for a pure government-run health insurance program — the public option sought by many liberal Democrats and reviled by Republicans. Supporters of the national plans say they will increase competition in state health insurance markets, many of which are dominated by a handful of companies.

The federal health plans are run by private insurance companies, but the government can negotiate the benefits and premiums. So this move by the Obama administration is a far cry from a public option. But that didn’t stop one conservative from sounding the alarm.

Robert E. Moffit, a senior fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation, said he worried that “the nationwide health plans, operating under terms and conditions set by the federal government, will become the robust public option that liberals always wanted.”

Although many on the left supported the public option, many single payer advocates vehemently opposed it, preferring instead an automatic expansion of Medicare to all Americans. So it’s telling that something far less than single payer would make Mr. Moffit a bit nervous. Why would he (and perhaps other free-market advocates) be so concerned that these private health benefits, under contract with the federal government, could suddenly morph into an entirely public plan? Maybe the idea of a public health plan has broader appeal than free marketers want to admit. The Government Employees Health Association, the organization that oversees federal employee health benefits, consistently gets high marks for patient satisfaction. And Medicare – a true single payer program – is immensely popular.

If large numbers of Americans end up choosing the federal plans in the health exchanges over other types of plans, that might take the steam out of a lot of anti-government rhetoric. If the majority of Americans find that they like their health benefits regulated by the government, it just might be easier for them to make the mental leap to accepting a system where health care is provided by the government. And that’s a very scary prospect for proponents of profit-driven health care.

Sylvia@californiaonecare.org

 

 

 

Supreme Court Upholds Obamacare

June 28th, 2012

Early Thursday morning, the U.S. Supreme Court, on a narrow 5-4 ruling, upheld most of the Affordable Care Act, with the exception of a part regarding Medicaid expansion. Read the entire decision here. President Obama addressed the nation just after noon Eastern Time:

Whatever the politics, today’s decision was a victory for people all over this country,” Mr. Obama said as he listed the law’s major provisions. “Thanks to today’s decicison (sic), all of these benefits and protections will continue.

Single payer advocates vow to fight on for Medicare for all. National Nurses United released a statement:

“Nurses experience the crisis our patients continue to endure every day. That’s the reason we will continue to work for reform that is universal, that doesn’t bankrupt families or leave patients in the often cruel hands of merciless insurance companies,” said NNU Co-president Karen Higgins, RN.

“Medicare is far more effective than the broken private system in controlling costs and the waste that goes to insurance paperwork and profits, and it is universally popular, even among those who bitterly opposed the Obama law,” said Higgins. “Let’s open it up to everyone, no one should have to wait to be 65 to be guaranteed healthcare.”

The Affordable Care Act still leaves some 27 million people without health coverage, does little to constrain rising out of pocket health care costs, or to stop the all too routine denials of needed medical care by insurance companies because they don’t want to pay for it.

The healthcare crisis is greater than ever, say nurses who see patients in distress every day. After all the attention on the court ruling fades, the problems will remain, said Higgins.

“We will continue to see a steady stream of employers dropping health coverage or shift more and more costs to their employees.”

Even after this decision, said Higgins, who was at the Supreme Court when the ruling was announced,

“We will continue to see patients who postpone filling prescription medications, or delay doctor-recommended diagnostic procedures or even life saving medical treatment because of the high out of pocket costs, or families faced with the terrible choice of paying for medical care or food or clothing, or who delay payment on medical bills at the risk of bankruptcy or a destroyed credit rating.”

“We will continue to see hospitals, insurance companies and drug companies engage in price gouging and insurance companies refusing to authorize treatment recommended by a doctor under the pretext it was “experimental” or “not medically necessary,” euphemisms for care that doesn’t meet the real test of a profit driven bottom line. “

Sylvia@californiaonecare.org

Could Adverse SCOTUS Ruling on Obamacare Provide Opening for a Public Option?

June 19th, 2012

As Judgment Day for the Affordable Care Act draws closer – a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court is expected in the next couple of weeks – legal observers, health experts and pundits are trying to predict what the fallout could be if the law is eviscerated or overturned. Undoing the ACA may not be that simple. Would the horrible consequences of suddenly snatching health care away from millions of Americans be enough to force Congress to open up Medicare to people under 65? Economist and former Clinton labor secretary Robert Reich thinks so.

Reich believes that if the individual mandate is struck down, health insurance companies, arguing that they’ll go bankrupt if they are forced to continue covering people with preexisting conditions, will clamor to get the requirement dropped. The problem for the insurance companies is that the preexisting condition requirement is one of the most popular parts of the ACA and Congress may be hesitant to get rid of it.

This opens the way to a political bargain. Insurers might be let off the hook, for example, only if they support allowing every American, including those with pre-existing conditions, to choose Medicare, or something very much like Medicare. In effect, what was known during the debate over the bill as the “public option.”

I hope Reich is correct, but it may be wishful thinking on his part. Right now, President Obama and the Democrats are still pinning their hopes on a positive ruling from SCOTUS and they don’t seem to be looking at a Plan B – at least, not publicly. And the Republicans seem content to do little or nothing. Some health insurers are even saying that they will voluntarily uphold some of the more popular provisions of the ACA (I don’t believe that for a second). The “sickcare” industry would rather maintain the status quo – and their ill-gotten profits – as long as possible than to see lawmakers open up Medicare. The insurers know that once Medicare is available to more people, the program will be in even more demand, hastening the health insurance industry’s demise. In the meantime, what will the reaction be from the public? Resignation and despair? Or will the sudden disappearance of what little healthcare safety net the ACA provides galvanize the public into demanding Medicare for all? I want to see the latter happen.

Some believe that if SCOTUS deals a death blow to the ACA, that that will spell the end of health reform. This is nonsense. Ignoring the healthcare crisis in this country won’t make it go away. It will get progressively worse. More American workers will see their health coverage dropped. Fewer employers will offer health coverage. Millions more Americans will go bankrupt. Even with the ACA in place, out-of-pocket medical costs continue to explode. Lawmakers can keep their heads in the sand for only so long. As the ranks of the uninsured and bankrupt expand to an ever larger proportion of the population, public outrage will grow. At that point, the din will be impossible to ignore.

Sylvia@CaliforniaOneCare.org