Posts Tagged ‘Jerry Brown’

Brown’s Budget Ax Comes Down on Healthcare Needy

March 30th, 2011

Gov. Jerry Brown’s first whack at California’s $26.6 billion budget deficit is going to hit low-income Californians hard, especially those who rely on the state to get health care. Last week, Brown signed a bill reducing the state’s deficit by $11.2 billion through cuts in social programs such as Medi-Cal and Healthy Families:

Details of the Cuts
Of the spending reductions signed on Thursday, about $5.8 billion came from trimming social services. For example, the measures cut:

  • $1.7 billion from Medi-Cal, California’s Medicaid program;
  • $1 billion from CalWORKs, California’s welfare-to-work program (Contra Costa Times, 3/24).
  • $1 billion from First 5 by shifting reserve funds from the early childhood health and education program to Medi-Cal children’s services;
  • $862 million from mental health services (Sacramento Bee, 3/25).

Health Program Changes
One of the bills (AB 97) signed Thursday outlines changes to health programs. For example, the bill:

  • Eliminates Medi-Cal coverage for adult day health care services;
  • Ends Medi-Cal coverage for nonprescription cold and cough medicine;
  • Limits Medi-Cal beneficiaries to seven physician visits annually in most cases;
  • Imposes a 10% reduction in reimbursement rates for doctors and hospitals that serve Medi-Cal beneficiaries;
  • Raises premiums for Healthy Families, California’s Children’s Health Insurance Program; and
  • Requires Medi-Cal beneficiaries to pay $5 copayments for doctor visits, $50 copays for emergency department visits and $100 daily copays for hospital stays up to a maximum of $200 (Weintraub, Healthy Cal, 3/24).

Read more: http://www.californiahealthline.org/articles/2011/3/25/brown-signs-budget-measures-involving-major-health-cuts.aspx#ixzz1I7GFsW3M

After weeks of fruitless haggling over how to slice the remaining $15.4 billion, Brown on Tuesday called off negotiations with Republicans, citing their refusal to allow voters to decide whether to extend income, vehicle and sales taxes. If Brown and the Democrats don’t come up with a way around the GOP roadblock, cuts to health care and other social programs are going to be even deeper. Brown made a promise during the gubernatorial campaign that he would seek the electorate’s opinion on whether to raise taxes, probably knowing full well that trying to get a 2/3 majority of the state legislature to approve a tax increase was virtually impossible. So right now, it doesn’t look good that lawmakers will be able to resolve the impasse.

So we’re left with millions of Californians who will suffer needlessly because they will have even less access to vital health services. No one would suffer if we had a statewide public insurance program, like SB 810, that spreads the burden and responsibility for taking care of the health of all Californians. Contrary to what many assert, our state is not broke. Just as it is the case across our nation, the wealth is concentrated in too few hands. We would not have a budget deficit if those with the ability to pay more in taxes would pay their fair share. We can well afford a public insurance program for all, and we must demand that our lawmakers make it happen.

Sylvia@californiaonecare.org

Single Payer is a Great Idea–But How Will We Pay For It?

January 31st, 2011

We have received a great deal of support for a single payer, universal health care plan as evidenced by the responses we get to our ads and blogs on the California OneCare website. But the one big question that keeps coming up is “How are we going to pay for it, since California is broke?”

Frankly, it’s an easy answer, because a single payer plan like SB 810 won’t cost money, it will actually save money–billions of dollars in fact. This is true for a couple of reasons. First, private insurance companies would be removed from the system and the money they waste would instead go to providing care. Studies show that private insurance wastes about 31 cents out of every premium dollar on paperwork, marketing, profits, and outrageous salaries for executives. By removing this extravagance from the system, there would be more than enough health care dollars to cover everyone and still save money for families, businesses and government. That’s the beauty of single payer. Instead of thousands of insurance plans, each with their own rules for deductibles, co-pays, exclusions, permissions, pre-approvals, in-system and out-of-system doctors and so forth, there would be only one comprehensive health insurance plan that would cover everybody. The plan would be administered by a state agency that would collect all of the health care “premiums” in the form of tax dollars, and then pay all of the health care providers from those funds. The California Health Insurance Agency would be the “single payer.”

The second reason that California OneCare would save money is because it would require the California Health Care Agency to negotiate for the lowest prices with pharmaceutical firms and medical equipment providers. Prescription drugs, for example, cost nearly twice as much in the U.S. as they do in single payer countries for the same medications. (And don’t believe that Big Pharma canard that lower drug prices will affect the research and development of new drugs. They spend twice as much on marketing as they do on R&D.)

As for medical equipment, why should a pair of surgical scissors costs over $1000? And an electric wheelchair cost more than half the price of a Ford Focus? Savings from these negotiated prices would be a significant part of lowering costs under a single payer system.

How do we know it will work? There is plenty of evidence that a single payer plan not only would provided comprehensive coverage for everyone and still save money. First there are the single payer plans in several other countries that provide care as good or better than ours at half the cost: Canada, Australia, Taiwan, Denmark, and Sweden, for example. Second, there have been at least twenty studies in various states in the U.S. over the past 18 years to determine which type of health care plan would cover everyone comprehensively at the lowest possible cost. Every one of these studies points to single payer as the only way to do it.

One of those studies was conducted by the Lewin Group here in California in 2005. It showed that a single payer plan–specifically SB 810 (it was SB 840 then)–would save $25 billion a year and $350 billion over ten years for the state of California. Furthermore, the plan would cost less for families and businesses than they are paying now for inadequate health coverage.

Next month, Senator Leno will reintroduce SB 810 in the California Legislature. Once again, it is expected to pass in both houses. Governor Brown has said that he would support single payer if he could be shown how it will be paid for. An economic study is currently underway that will show, once again, that single payer is self-funding and will actually help to solve California’s financial crisis. Armed with that study, we are confident that we can convince Governor Brown to sign SB 810 in August of 2012.

There have also been discussions in the State Strategy Group for Single Payer that we can overcome the requirement for a two-thirds vote to finance SB 810 by taking the issue directly to the voters with a ballot initiative. More about that in the near future. Needless to say, it’s going to be an exciting couple of years!

Don Schroeder, Chair
California OneCare

As Vermont Goes, So Goes the Nation

January 25th, 2011

Vermont is going full-steam ahead on its plans to establish a single payer healthcare program for its citizens. Last week, Harvard healthcare economist William Hsiao went before the full Vermont state legislature to present his ideas on how the state can implement a single payer system. Professor Hsiao most notably helped set up Taiwan’s single payer program. Below is a video of the entire presentation, filmed by Vermont Health Care For All. After the presentation, Hsiao and members of the Vermont legislature addressed reporters at a news conference, which you can access at vtdigger.org.

Hsiao’s proposal for Vermont is not a pure government-run single payer system, but a public/private plan run by an independent board. Although Dr. Don McCanne of Physicians for a National Health Plan has a few quibbles with Hsiao’s recommendations, he believes the plan is a good start. Writes McCanne, “Although advocates of the pure single payer model will find some problems with this report on a reform proposal for Vermont, there is very good news in this analysis. The report emphatically confirms the superiority of the single payer model in ensuring that everyone is included while containing health care costs.”

Predictably, the insurance companies are not happy with Vermont’s plans to spoil their party. It’s gratifying to see how helpless they are in the face of a single-payer friendly legislature, and their worst nightmare, a new governor, Peter Shumlin, who is a fierce advocate of single payer and ran on it in his platform. And the state is represented in the U.S. Senate by longtime single-payer cheerleader, Bernie Sanders. It’s as if the stars have aligned for Vermonters. It looks like Vermont may beat us here in California in the race to become the first state to embrace a single payer plan and be a model for the nation. If Arnold Schwarzenegger hadn’t stood in the way, California could have been first long ago. Watch Gov. Shumlin being interviewed below on Democracy Now! on Jan. 21:

Gov. Jerry Brown is up to his eyeballs in California’s intractable budget mess. Meanwhile, State Sen. Mark Leno soon plans to re-introduce SB 810 into our state legislature. After being passed in the legislature twice (and vetoed by Schwarzenegger twice), the bill failed last year to go through a third time. It’s still not yet clear whether Brown will sign it, even though he campaigned on single payer as a presidential candidate in 1992. So, what explains the foot dragging? The nature of California politics? The passage of federal reforms in Washington? Brown can’t possibly use the budget crisis as an excuse because single payer will save the state money. Maybe Professor Hsiao and Vermont can give him a nudge.

What’s so exciting about what’s happening in Vermont is that the single payer movement may finally get the laboratory it desperately needs right in our own back yard. The state still needs to get a waiver from the federal government to start the plan, something Shumlin and Sanders are actively pursuing. Vermont can show the skeptics that single payer is the most affordable and fairest way to deliver health care to everyone. And the naysayers will no longer be able to dismiss single payer as “foreign.” Vermont’s efforts can help propel our case forward here in California. It would be great if Sen. Leno could get Hsiao to do his presentation before Brown and our legislature. The skeptics would have no choice but to listen.

Sylvia@californiaonecare.org

Don McCanne, MD: California financial crisis, health students, and single payer

January 14th, 2011

Brown Unveils Budget Plan With Extensive Spending Reductions

California Healthline
January 11, 2011

(Gov. Jerry) Brown’s proposed budget would reduce spending by about $135.7 million by enacting changes to Healthy Families, California’s Children’s Health Insurance Program.

Brown’s budget also proposes $1.7 billion in cuts to Medi-Cal, California’s Medicaid program.

http://www.californiahealthline.org/articles/2011/1/11/brown-unveils-budget-plan-with-extensive-spending-reductions.aspx

And…

Labor is out-organized at budget protest

By Michael J. Mishak
Los Angeles Times
January 10, 2011

If today’s budget protests are any indication, organized labor needs to get, well, organized.

After Gov. Jerry Brown unveiled his budget, a handful of labor leaders gathered on the north steps of the Capitol to talk about the concerns of workers and recipients of In-Home Supportive Services and other programs that would see steep cuts. They didn’t get very far.

George Popyack, of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, was explaining how shifting state services to local governments could compromise quality when he was drowned out by hundreds of students descending on the steps for a separate demonstration in support of single-payer healthcare. Reporters and a camera crew turned to observe the students, who were chanting through bullhorns and banging drums.

“Well, we just lost the camera,” Popyack said.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/california-politics/2011/01/if-todays-budget-protests-are-any-indication-organized-labor-needs-to-get-well-organized-after-gov-jerry-brown-unvei.html

For report on the single payer rally by Erica Mu of KALW (audio and transcript):
http://kalwnews.org/audio/2011/01/10/could-single-payer-be-future-healthcare-california_782712.html

California Health Professional Student Alliance (CaHPSA):
http://www.cahpsa.org/CaHPSA/Lobby_Day.html

Comment:

By Don McCanne, MD

California’s budget crisis is a disaster. The draconian budget cuts will especially impact the state’s health and human services programs, including Medi-Cal and the Children’s Health Insurance Program. The good news is that California’s health professional students are not going to put up with it. They showed up by the hundreds to demand the enactment of a single payer system.

The future of our health care system is in good hands.

Re-posted with permission from pnhp.org.