Posts Tagged ‘Doctor’

As many predicted, health insurance costs skyrocketing, insured Americans forgoing care

September 28th, 2011

by nyceve

As the debate played out during the contentious summer of 2009 before the passage of the Affordable Care Act, many were deeply concerned that the insurance industry would escalate its war against the American people. We feared and predicted even more egregious price gouging.

It seems all our fears were justified.

As we know, even insured Americans are delaying or forgoing needed and necessary healthcare because the high deductible junk insurance they have (which is all they can afford), requires huge out-of-pocket costs, making healthcare a luxury. And please keep in mind, we’re talking about people with insurance. Insured Americans are consuming less health not because they don’t need to see a doctor, but because they can’t afford to do so. This is what the insurers want, they collect our premiums, sell us high deductible insurance which we can’t even afford to use.

A new study just released by the Kaiser Family Foundation paints as grim a picture of the U.S. healthcare system and its unaffordability, as I have ever read. It is ghastly and our healthcare system is on the precipice of collapse.

After several years of relatively modest premium increases, annual premiums for employer-sponsored family health coverage increased to $15,073 this year, up 9 percent from last year, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation/Health Research & Educational Trust 2011 Employer Health Benefits Survey released today.  On average, workers pay $4,129 and employers pay $10,944 toward those annual premiums.
Premiums increased significantly faster than workers’ wages (2.1 percent) and general inflation (3.2 percent).  Since 2001, family premiums have increased 113 percent, compared with 34 percent for workers’ wages and 27 percent for inflation.

“This year’s nine percent increase in premiums is especially painful for workers and employers struggling through a weak recovery,” Kaiser President and CEO Drew Altman, Ph.D. said.

You should not be surprised at this terrible and deeply demoralizing state of affairs. There is little (or nothing) in the Affordable Care Act which requires insurers to make their junk products affordable. Even worse, despite paying a huge percentage of our dwindling income to buy insurance, Americans are paying for almost useless policies. I define a useless policy as one with high deductibles and high out-of-pocket costs.  As the economy continues to show little or no improvement, even workers with insurance are not getting the care they need to do all the costs they are expected to shoulder.

And to make a bad situation even more troubling, the added benefits, insurers are now required to provide due to the passage of the Affordable Care Act, are giving them the cover to raise rates to unconscionable levels and ‘blame’ the ACA.

Throughout this year, major health insurers have defended higher premiums — and higher profits — saying that their expenses would rise once the economy recovered and people believed they could again afford medical care. The struggling economy will probably keep suppressing demand for medical care, particularly as people pay a larger share of their own medical bills through higher deductibles and co-payments, according to benefits consultants and others. About three-quarters of workers now pay part of the bill when they go see a doctor, and nearly a third have a deductible of at least $1,000 if they have single coverage, up from just one in 10 in 2006, according Kaiser.

The Affordable Care Act was written without teeth or strong enforcement mechanisms, but that is old, sad news.  To be fair, the ACA allocates money to the states to police rate hikes, but it is powerless to stop them, and many believe this is really window dressing to give cover to the politicians and to make the very gullible American people think the government is trying to bring us some relief.

Every  day in America, 3,700 families file for bankruptcy caused by illness and medical bills, and that number is rising. This shameful situation happens in no other wealthy democracy. It would be a scandal anywhere else. Most medically bankrupt families were middle-class before they suffered financial setbacks. Roughly 60 percent of them had attended college; 20 percent of families included a military veteran or active-duty soldier.

Most astoundingly, 60 percent of the individuals whose illness led to bankruptcy had private, for-profit health insurance when they got sick. Don’t we buy health insurance to avoid financial ruin? High deductibles lead directly to bankruptcy and foreclosure. To make matters worse, they cause people to postpone needed care. All of which lead to higher insurance company profits.

You should be very, very scared to be an American citizen. I’m sorry to say this, it’s the truth.

Nyceve is a board member for California OneCare. Originally posted in the DailyKos.

Concentrated Wealth Is THE Barrier to True Healthcare Reform

September 23rd, 2011

In an excellent essay posted on the site October2011.org, Dr. Margaret Flowers of Physicians for a National Health Program writes that the real reason we still don’t have Medicare for all in this country is because of the immense power of concentrated wealth.

…the single payer movement is not in a position to counter the corporate stranglehold on our political process. And, in reality, winning single payer in isolation will not accomplish much towards improving the health of our population if we do not also address the social determinants of health such as education, the environment, housing, violence, jobs and equal rights.

Under our current political system, one in which Democrats and Republicans are controlled by concentrated corporate power and in which independent parties have no opportunity to succeed, all who advocate for peace and social, economic and environmental justice face the same barriers. Together these movements have the strength to take on corporate power. We will never match corporate power with our collective dollars when the richest 400 people  have more wealth than 154 million people, but we can defeat them with our collective voices.

Dr. Flowers is right. We must acknowledge the fact that the U.S. political system is rigged in favor of the enriched few. A system where politicians must constantly raise huge sums of money in order to gain office is a system that serves the interests of the wealthy few over the interests of the many. This system is the primary barrier to achieving a healthcare reform that is fair, equitable and affordable for all. And that is a system that must be changed. Concentrated power must be confronted and defeated by organizing coalitions of single payer activists with other groups who fight for social and economic justice. We can do this if we work together.

Sylvia@californiaonecare.org

Don McCanne, MD: Comparing USA and UK on efficiency and effectiveness

September 19th, 2011

NHS among developed world’s most efficient health systems, says study

By Randeep Ramesh

guardian.co.uk, August 7, 2011

The NHS is one of the most cost-effective health systems in the developed world, according to a study published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

The “surprising” findings show the NHS saving more lives for each pound spent as a proportion of national wealth than any other country apart from Ireland over 25 years. Among the 17 countries considered, the United States healthcare system was among the least efficient and effective.

Researchers said that this contradicted assertions by the health secretary, Andrew Lansley, that the NHS needed competition and choice to become more efficient.

“The government proposals to change the NHS are largely based on the idea that the NHS is less efficient and effective than other countries, especially the US,” said Professor Colin Pritchard, of Bournemouth University, who analysed a quarter of a century’s data from 1980.

“The results question why we need a big set of health reform proposals … The system works well. Look at the US and you can see where choice and competition gets you. Pretty dismal results.”

The study will be a blow for Lansley, who argues that patients should choose between competing hospital services and GPs.

Pritchard points out that even Adam Smith, the Scottish economist and father of market-based ideology, thought the state was “probably better” at health and education.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/aug/07/nhs-among-most-efficient-health-services#history-link-box

And…

Comparing the USA, UK and 17 Western countries’ efficiency and effectiveness in reducing mortality

By Colin Pritchard and Mark S Wallace

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Short Reports, July 1, 2011

Conclusions

In cost-effective terms, i.e. economic input versus clinical output, the USA healthcare system was one of the least cost-effective in reducing mortality rates whereas the UK was one of the most cost-effective over the period.

http://shortreports.rsmjournals.com/content/2/7/60.full

Comment:

By Don McCanne, MD

We continue to be faced with the painful truth that the United States has the highest health care costs while our mortality rates compare unfavorably to many other countries. The authors of this study suggest that the U.S. model of “choice and competition” may be a major source of our dismal results.

The British are using our model to show their would-be reformers that their single, integrated National Health Service is more efficient and effective than our model based on private, marketplace competition. When will we learn the same lesson?

Re-posted with permission from pnhp.org.

PNHP: New Census Figures on Uninsured Show Urgent Need for National Health Care

September 14th, 2011

Number of uninsured climbs to highest figure since passage of Medicare, Medicaid
50 million uninsured shows urgency of enacting single-payer Medicare for all: national doctors group

Official estimates by the Census Bureau showing an increase of about 1 million in the number of Americans without health insurance in 2010 – to a 45-year high of 49.9 million persons, or 16.3 percent of the population, under the bureau’s revised calculation method – underscore the urgency of going beyond the Obama administration’s federal health law and swiftly implementing a single-payer, improved Medicare-for-all program, spokespersons for Physicians for a National Health Program said today.

Employment-based coverage continued to decline. The bureau said 55.3 percent of Americans were covered by employment-based plans in 2010, down from 56.1 percent in 2009. It was the eleventh consecutive year of decline, from 64.2 percent in 2000.

Read the rest of the article here.